What is Jim's best choice to address the ongoing vulnerability flag from the scanner after applying a patch?

The best choice involves asking the information security team to flag the system as patched or not vulnerable, as this action signifies a formal confirmation of the remediation process after applying the patch. It creates an official record that the vulnerability has been addressed, allowing for better management and tracking of vulnerabilities within the organization's systems. This step ensures that stakeholders are aware of the current status of the system and can take appropriate steps if further action is required.

By involving the information security team, there is a collaborative approach in ensuring the effectiveness of the patch. This can also lead to further review to ensure no residual vulnerabilities are overlooked, enhancing the organization's overall security posture.

In contrast, ignoring the scans and monitoring performance does not address the underlying risk posed by the vulnerability and could leave the system exposed. Reapplying the patch may not be necessary unless there is evidence that the patch was improperly applied or there are additional, unaddressed vulnerabilities. Adjusting the vulnerability scanner settings could lead to an incomplete picture of the system’s security posture, as it might mask potential risks that need to be managed instead of eliminating them.