Saria is writing a request for proposal for a code review. What type should she specify to ensure consideration of business logic?

Choosing a manual code review is the most effective option for ensuring consideration of business logic within the code. Manual code reviews involve human reviewers who can assess the code in detail, evaluating not just the syntax and structure but also the underlying business logic and requirements. This allows reviewers to apply their contextual knowledge about the application and its intended functionality, highlighting potential vulnerabilities or discrepancies related to how the code implements the business requirements.

Unlike automated code reviews and static code analysis, which primarily focus on syntax errors or general coding practices, a manual code review engages individuals who can ask contextual questions and provide insights based on experience and familiarity with the business processes involved. Peer code review, while beneficial for collaborative input, may still lack the depth required to assess complex business logic thoroughly, particularly in collaborative settings where reviewers may have varying levels of understanding of the business context. Therefore, specifying a manual code review in Saria's request ensures that the evaluators will consider the business logic critically and holistically.